Corporate Scandal

Thursday, March 23, 2006

Were You Really Listening The First Time???

I always considered myself an anarcho-demo-adaptionist. That in itself requires a lengthy explanation. The point is, I don't fit any traditional labels in the arena of politics, economics, ethics, or spirituality. I am a new breed, not looking for any disciples, not interested in any apostles. It's a personal belief system. Although I feel that my beliefs, when applied, would make a fully functioning society my personal beliefs stop me from infringing upon anyone else's right to set up their own government system, as long as that system doesn't infringe upon the rights of others.

However, as of late I have realized that I do, indeed, have foes. They are not in corpeal form. They are intangible forms, floating through the air. They are thoughts and belief systems which inhabit the human mind and are destructive to people and the surrounding environment. These ideas are most commonly found in the neo-conservative movement. My foe is totalitarianism or anything which infinges upon the rights of individuals who do not wish to be a part of that system.

I am not an enemy of any state. I am not an enemy of any nation. I believe that nations are archaic structures no longer necessary for personal development, but if people are willing to subscribe to the foundations of that structure then they are entitled to do so.

I do not consider myself a citizen of any state or nation. I mean this metaphorically. I can not say that I do not benefit from my rights of a citizen of the United States. All I can say is that my rights as a citizen are being stepped on, and the rights entitled to us by the constitution are the bare minimum of the rights which should be entitled to the population of the planet.

The current capitalist totalitarianism is not beneficial to the majority of people. That is a no brainer. Anyone who has seen the plight and suffering of the world should know that this structure is cruel and unbalanced. We are consoled by the party line: "This is the best things can be. Don't fix what ain't broken. There is no better system."

This is not true.

When this country was founded it was entirely different than it was ten years later. Every ten yeaars our country has changed. Sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worst. All systems decay. It is a matter of entropy. We have not reached the pinnacle of order, we have reached the pinnacle of chaos.

In 1776 it was decided by the United States that all men were entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Let's take a close look at this statement. It sounds good. It sounds really good. Wait a moment. Controversy arises. All men. Does this mean mankind? Or does this mean men, as in someone who possesses a tallywhacker, a schlong, a ding dong, a nut sac with a salome dangling in the middle, a penis, a woo woo, a dick, XY chromosomes, and a genital representation of manhood?

The definition of "men" in 1776 was all white, property owning men, above the age of 35. And everyone else? Fuck 'em.

We've come a long way, baby. But just when you think that you're reaching a point of total equality something comes along like...Reagan, Bush, Bush 2.0, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Ashcroft, and Jeb Bush. HE STOLE AN ELECTION PEOPLE!!! Does that mean nothing? If you're willing to look closely, he stole two. And not in that "stole the publics eyes," no I mean ripped the beating heart out of the chest of democracy "stole".

Then he ignored crucial information that terrorists, led by bin Laden would attack the World Trade Center, that terrorists may utilize airplanes as weapons, that THERE WAS A HIGH PROBABILITY OF A TERRORIST ATTACK ON 9/11. "But, hey," the American populace says. "In the great scheme of things, who gives a fuck?"

His cabinet pushed unconstitutional legislation using scare tactics. A frightened legislature signed the Patriot Act as if it could guard them against the evils of a terrorist attack. Instead, something else occured. A coup de tat of our system. A hijacking of massive proportions. THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT WAS STOLEN.

Our political system has worked since 1776 in a "Cold Civil War" sort of fashion. Although there are many ideologies at war, the decisions have been democratically handled. Well, not always.

This is all a rough sketch. Get ready for the book. These are just a few of the things that I will talk about. There's so much more. Oh, so much more.

God, I can't take anymore.

But, there is more.

DAVID G.

Sunday, March 19, 2006

As Literature Dies...

When I was in 4th grade I started reading Stephen King. I eventually read all the horror greats. As I grew older my choice in books expanded. I read everything that I could get my hands on. Vonnegut, Dostovesky, Dickens, Bradbury...name it.

I regret to inform you that literature is dying. It's been dying for a long time. We didn't catch the cancer in time.

Borders, Barnes & Nobles, Penguin, Random House, Dell, Ballantine...gigantic corporation dictate what we read.

So, you're a rebel. You walk into a bookstore looking for that anarcho-nihilist literature that separates you from the herd of the weaker portion of humanity. Sitting on a stand is the new book by Chuck Palahnuik. You're definitely going to buy it. After all, Fight Club was so fucking cool. But before you even picked up the book Random House already knew that you would. They own Anchor books and pay good money for you to see that book. Companies pay good money to keep their books up front.

(Don't worry. I'm a guilty party in this charade.)

Guilty as charged, dear reader! I am guilty of judging a book by its cover. And that's what they rely on.

To be continued when I'm more pissed off...

http://www.myspace.com/davidusmontoyacus

http://www.maguspress.com


Saturday, March 18, 2006

MIC: The Military Industrial Complex (2006) Pt. 1

War is violent passion unleashed. The act of performing violence against another person has a deep psychological impact on the individual. It is my personal belief (which happpens to be reinforced by empirical data) that patriarchal organizations are detrimental towards mutual respect between genders.

To get to the point: MUTUAL RESPECT MEANS STOP COMMITTING SEXUAL ASSAULT!!!

Or more specifically: STOP SEXUAL ASSAULT.

Reports of sexual assault increased 40% since last year in the military. The Pentagon claims that part of the reason is a new program which asks victims to come forward.

Personally speaking:

I am opposed to war.
I am opposed to an offensive military.
I am opposed to the immensity of military spending.

However, if the military is going to continue to exist in its present form, I have a few suggestions.

Correct me if I'm mistaken, but the military is supposed to teach discipline. How about discipline towards members of the opposite sex or members of the same sex that you are physically attracted to. Contrary to popular belief, pinching someone's ass is not military lingo for "good morning."

The Pentagon report on sexual assault can be found with the following link:

http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/ap/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/storytext/military_sex_assaults/18421615/SIG=12c86fe3s/*http://www.sapr.mil/contents/references/2005%20RTC%20Sexual%20Assaults.pdf

http://www.myspace.com/davidusmontoyacus

http://www.maguspress.com

Friday, March 17, 2006

When Wal-Mart Owns Your Soul...

When Wal-Mart owns your soul...
...don't worry, they own everything else.

Political Comments:

Wal-Mart, while sitting on its high horse of morality, is one of the most lethal companies to small communities, independent businesses, and ethics.

It won't shock anyone when I say the words: sweatshop and crippling blow to the American businessperson. What several people don't know is that Wal-Mart is also responsible for increased crime and poverty rates.

After all, we've become accustomed to sweat shops. We've gotten used to giant corporations squashing our local businesses. But there is something darker lurking beneath the visage of the smiling Wal-Mart face, which the following links will show...but first...

Personal Comments:

First, video killed the radio star. Then, the internet killed the video star. Progress is not necessarily a bad thing, but when a corporation kills workers rights and uses the foundations of this nation's principles for toilet paper, people should be outraged. But heck, we're a mellow herd.

A friend of mine said that she couldn't trust a store "that sold everything." The concept scared her. I thought it was an interesting reaction in our world of mega-stores.

Useful Links:

http://www.alternet.org/story/12962/

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/walmart/

http://walmartwatch.com/